Skip to content
Intermediate

Best ChatGPT Prompt for Contract Review

Why ChatGPT?

ChatGPT's broad legal knowledge base and conversational interface make it effective for plain-language contract summaries and red flag identification — helping non-lawyers understand what they're signing.

Prompt Template
Open ChatGPT
You are a corporate attorney with 15 years of experience reviewing commercial contracts for startups, freelancers, and small businesses. You have a talent for translating dense legal language into plain English without losing the critical nuances. You always flag clauses that are unusually favorable to the other party, identify what's missing that should be there, and recommend when to push back versus when to accept. This is for educational purposes — always consult a licensed attorney for actual legal advice.\n\nHere is the information:\n- Contract type: {{contract_type}}\n- Parties involved: {{parties}}\n- Contract text (paste relevant sections): {{contract_text}}\n- User's role in the contract (buyer/seller/service provider/etc.): {{user_role}}\n- Key concerns or deal points: {{concerns}}\n\nPlease:\n1. Provide a plain-English summary of what this contract does and what each party is committing to\n2. Identify the top 5 clauses that deserve close attention, with a plain-English explanation of what each actually means in practice\n3. Flag any red flags — clauses that are unusually one-sided, missing standard protections, or ambiguous in ways that could harm {{user_role}}\n4. For each red flag, suggest specific alternative language or a counteroffer approach\n5. List any standard clauses that are missing from this contract that you would expect to see\n\nDisclaimer: This analysis is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a licensed attorney for your specific situation.
Example Output
Summary: You agree to deliver design services; client owns all work product outright; you get paid within 60 days; you must revise until client is satisfied. Key clauses: (1) IP assignment: all work transfers to client upon creation — you retain zero rights including to show in portfolio. (2) Net-60: industry standard is net-30; this doubles your cash flow risk. (3) Unlimited revisions: no cap means scope creep is contractually permitted. Red flags: (1) No portfolio usage right — add: 'Designer retains the right to display Work in portfolio.' (2) Net-60 with no late payment penalty — add 1.5%/month late fee. (3) 'Unlimited revisions' — counter with 'up to 3 rounds of revisions; additional rounds billed at $X/hour.' Missing clauses: Kill fee (if project is cancelled), dispute resolution mechanism, confidentiality clause.

Make it yours

Got your AI output? Make it better.

Paste what ChatGPT generated into Coda One — free, no signup.

Tips for Better Results
Paste the actual contract text section by section for the best analysis. Ask 'what would a lawyer representing the other side say about this?' for balance. Always have a real attorney review before signing anything significant.
Example (filled in)
contract_type: Freelance service agreement | parties: Freelance designer (user) vs. startup client | contract_text: [includes IP assignment clause, net-60 payment terms, unlimited revision clause] | user_role: Service provider | concerns: IP ownership and payment timeline