Documentation-Accurate Code Generation
VerifiedGenerate code that references actual documentation, preventing hallucination bugs. ALWAYS loads docs first, validates against API signatures, and verifies co...
$ Add to .claude/skills/ About This Skill
# Documentation-Accurate Code Generation
CRITICAL: This skill prevents LLM hallucination by enforcing documentation reference.
When to Use - **ALWAYS** when generating code - **ALWAYS** when using APIs - **ALWAYS** when creating configurations - **ALWAYS** when implementing features
Core Philosophy
NEVER generate code from memory. ALWAYS reference documentation.
The Problem - LLMs hallucinate APIs that don't exist - Methods get renamed or removed - Parameters change or get deprecated - Return types shift unexpectedly - Configuration formats evolve
The Solution 1. **Load documentation FIRST** — Before writing any code 2. **Extract API signatures** — Get actual method signatures 3. **Generate from docs** — Use real API data 4. **Validate against docs** — Check generated code matches 5. **Reference tracking** — Document which docs were used
Workflow
- ```
- IDENTIFY → What code/API/tool is needed?
- LOCATE → Find documentation source
- LOAD → Fetch and parse documentation
- EXTRACT → Pull API signatures, parameters, examples
- GENERATE → Create code using actual docs
- VALIDATE → Check code matches documentation
- REFERENCE → Track what docs were used
- ```
Documentation Sources
1. OpenClaw Internal Docs - Location: `C:\Users\clipp\AppData\Roaming\npm\node_modules\openclaw\docs` - Access: `read` tool - Use: For OpenClaw-specific APIs, tools, skills
2. Tool Documentation - Tool help: `--help` flags - Man pages: `man <command>` - Official docs: Use `web_fetch` to get docs
3. API Documentation - Official docs: Use `web_fetch` - OpenAPI specs: Parse and reference - Package docs: npm, pip, cargo docs
4. Code Examples - Existing code: Read similar implementations - Tests: Check test files for usage patterns - Examples: Find working code samples
Process for Code Generation
Step 1: Documentation Discovery ```bash # For OpenClaw tools read("openclaw-docs-path/tool-name.md")
# For external tools web_fetch("https://docs.tool.com/api")
# For local tools exec("tool --help") ```
Step 2: API Signature Extraction ```markdown # Extract: - Method names - Parameters (names, types, required/optional) - Return types - Error handling - Examples - Version information ```
Step 3: Code Generation ```python # Generate code using actual API data def generate_from_docs(api_docs): # Use real method names # Use real parameter names # Use real return types # Include error handling from docs # Add docstrings from docs pass ```
Step 4: Validation ```python def validate_against_docs(code, api_docs): # Check method names match # Check parameter names match # Check types match # Check return types match # Verify no hallucinated methods pass ```
Quick Actions
- `codegen <api>` — Generate code with doc reference
- `validate <code>` — Check code against docs
- `doc-lookup <api>` — Load and display documentation
- `api-extract <tool>` — Extract API signatures
Usage Examples
``` "Generate code to use the OpenClaw sessions_spawn tool" # Process: Load docs → Extract API → Generate → Validate
"Create a Python script using the requests library" # Process: Fetch requests docs → Extract API → Generate → Validate
"Write configuration for OpenClaw channels" # Process: Load config docs → Extract format → Generate → Validate ```
Validation Rules
1. Method Name Validation - Check method exists in docs - Verify spelling matches exactly - Confirm method is not deprecated
2. Parameter Validation - All required parameters present - Parameter names match docs exactly - Parameter types match docs - Optional parameters marked correctly
3. Return Type Validation - Return type matches docs - Error types match docs - Edge cases handled
4. Configuration Validation - Keys match documentation - Value types match schema - Required fields present - Format matches specification
Error Prevention
Common Hallucination Patterns 1. **Non-existent methods** — Methods that don't exist 2. **Wrong parameter names** — Hallucinated parameter names 3. **Wrong types** — Incorrect parameter/return types 4. **Missing error handling** — Ignoring documented errors 5. **Wrong configuration format** — Incorrect config structure
Prevention Strategies 1. **Always load docs first** — Never generate from memory 2. **Extract actual signatures** — Don't guess API shape 3. **Validate everything** — Check against real docs 4. **Reference tracking** — Know which docs were used 5. **Test with real APIs** — Verify code actually works
Integration Points
With Other Skills - **Coding skill**: Use this for doc-accurate code - **Self-evolution**: Update skills with doc validation - **Content generation**: Generate accurate code examples - **Research**: Research APIs from actual docs
With OpenClaw Tools - **read**: Load internal documentation - **web_fetch**: Fetch external documentation - **exec**: Run tools with `--help` for docs - **edit/write**: Create validated code
Reference Tracking
Format ```markdown # Code Generation Reference
Generated Code - File: path/to/file.py - Generated: 2026-02-23 - Tool: doc-accurate-codegen
Documentation Sources 1. OpenClaw Tool Docs: /docs/tools/exec.md 2. API Reference: https://docs.example.com/api 3. Examples: /examples/exec-usage.py
Validation - ✅ Method names validated - ✅ Parameters validated - ✅ Return types validated - ✅ Error handling validated
Notes - Using exec tool with sandbox mode - All parameters from official docs - Error handling from API reference ```
Output Template
When generating code, always include:
```python # Code generated with documentation reference # Source: [documentation URL or path] # Validated: [timestamp] # API Version: [version if available]
def function_name(): """ [Docstring from actual documentation] Source: [link to docs] Parameters: [from docs] Returns: [from docs] """ # Implementation using actual API pass ```
Best Practices
- Docs First, Always — Never generate without loading docs
- Exact Matches — Use exact names, types, formats from docs
- Validate Everything — Check all generated code
- Track References — Document which docs were used
- Test Real APIs — Actually run the code to verify
- Update Regularly — Re-check docs as APIs evolve
- Error Handling — Include all documented errors
- Examples — Reference working examples from docs
Common Pitfalls
- Assuming API stability — APIs change, always re-check docs
- Memory over docs — Trust docs, not memory
- Partial loading — Load complete documentation
- No validation — Always validate generated code
- Missing references — Always track doc sources
Success Metrics
- Hallucination rate: 0% (all code references actual docs)
- Validation rate: 100% (all code validated)
- Reference tracking: 100% (all code has doc sources)
- Error rate: 0% (no API misuse)
- Test pass rate: 100% (all generated code works)
Advanced Features
1. Automatic Doc Loading - Detect what APIs are needed - Automatically fetch relevant docs - Cache for future use
2. API Change Detection - Monitor docs for changes - Alert when APIs change - Suggest code updates
3. Multi-Source Validation - Cross-reference multiple doc sources - Detect conflicts between sources - Use most authoritative source
4. Example Extraction - Extract working examples from docs - Adapt examples to specific needs - Test examples before using
Integration with OpenClaw
Tool Documentation ```bash # Get tool help exec("tool --help")
# Read tool docs read("openclaw/docs/tools/tool-name.md")
# Check tool examples read("openclaw/examples/tool-usage.md") ```
Skill Documentation ```bash # Read skill docs read("skills/skill-name/SKILL.md")
# Check skill examples read("skills/skill-name/examples/") ```
Configuration Documentation ```bash # Read config docs read("openclaw/docs/configuration.md")
# Check config examples read("openclaw/examples/config/") ```
---
Remember: This skill exists because LLMs hallucinate. ALWAYS use it for code generation. The only way to prevent bugs is to reference actual documentation.
Use Cases
- Generate code that strictly follows API documentation and specifications
- Produce implementation code that matches documented interface contracts exactly
- Create SDK wrappers that accurately reflect the documented API surface
- Validate generated code against documentation to catch spec violations
- Reduce bugs caused by misunderstanding API documentation during manual coding
Pros & Cons
Pros
- +Documentation-first approach ensures generated code matches the spec
- +Reduces human interpretation errors when converting docs to code
- +Validation step catches discrepancies between docs and generated output
Cons
- -Quality depends entirely on the accuracy and completeness of input documentation
- -Only available on claude-code and openclaw platforms
- -Cannot generate code for undocumented behaviors or implicit conventions
FAQ
What does Documentation-Accurate Code Generation do?
What platforms support Documentation-Accurate Code Generation?
What are the use cases for Documentation-Accurate Code Generation?
100+ free AI tools
Writing, PDF, image, and developer tools — all in your browser.
Next Step
Use the skill detail page to evaluate fit and install steps. For a direct browser workflow, move into a focused tool route instead of staying in broader support surfaces.