Clinical Decision Support
VerifiedClinical decision support with variant interpretation and drug safety
$ Add to .claude/skills/ About This Skill
# Clinical Decision Support Documents
Description
Generate professional clinical decision support (CDS) documents for pharmaceutical companies, clinical researchers, and medical decision-makers. This skill specializes in analytical, evidence-based documents that inform treatment strategies and drug development:
- Patient Cohort Analysis - Biomarker-stratified group analyses with statistical outcome comparisons
- Treatment Recommendation Reports - Evidence-based clinical guidelines with GRADE grading and decision algorithms
All documents are generated as publication-ready LaTeX/PDF files optimized for pharmaceutical research, regulatory submissions, and clinical guideline development.
Note: For individual patient treatment plans at the bedside, use the `treatment-plans` skill instead. This skill focuses on group-level analyses and evidence synthesis for pharmaceutical/research settings.
Writing Style: For publication-ready documents targeting medical journals, consult the venue-templates skill's `medical_journal_styles.md` for guidance on structured abstracts, evidence language, and CONSORT/STROBE compliance.
Capabilities
Document Types
- Patient Cohort Analysis
- Biomarker-based patient stratification (molecular subtypes, gene expression, IHC)
- Molecular subtype classification (e.g., GBM mesenchymal-immune-active vs proneural, breast cancer subtypes)
- Outcome metrics with statistical analysis (OS, PFS, ORR, DOR, DCR)
- Statistical comparisons between subgroups (hazard ratios, p-values, 95% CI)
- Survival analysis with Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests
- Efficacy tables and waterfall plots
- Comparative effectiveness analyses
- Pharmaceutical cohort reporting (trial subgroups, real-world evidence)
- Treatment Recommendation Reports
- Evidence-based treatment guidelines for specific disease states
- Strength of recommendation grading (GRADE system: 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B, 2C)
- Quality of evidence assessment (high, moderate, low, very low)
- Treatment algorithm flowcharts with TikZ diagrams
- Line-of-therapy sequencing based on biomarkers
- Decision pathways with clinical and molecular criteria
- Pharmaceutical strategy documents
- Clinical guideline development for medical societies
Clinical Features
- Biomarker Integration: Genomic alterations (mutations, CNV, fusions), gene expression signatures, IHC markers, PD-L1 scoring
- Statistical Analysis: Hazard ratios, p-values, confidence intervals, survival curves, Cox regression, log-rank tests
- Evidence Grading: GRADE system (1A/1B/2A/2B/2C), Oxford CEBM levels, quality of evidence assessment
- Clinical Terminology: SNOMED-CT, LOINC, proper medical nomenclature, trial nomenclature
- Regulatory Compliance: HIPAA de-identification, confidentiality headers, ICH-GCP alignment
- Professional Formatting: Compact 0.5in margins, color-coded recommendations, publication-ready, suitable for regulatory submissions
Pharmaceutical and Research Use Cases
This skill is specifically designed for pharmaceutical and clinical research applications:
- Drug Development
- Phase 2/3 Trial Analyses: Biomarker-stratified efficacy and safety analyses
- Subgroup Analyses: Forest plots showing treatment effects across patient subgroups
- Companion Diagnostic Development: Linking biomarkers to drug response
- Regulatory Submissions: IND/NDA documentation with evidence summaries
- Medical Affairs
- KOL Education Materials: Evidence-based treatment algorithms for thought leaders
- Medical Strategy Documents: Competitive landscape and positioning strategies
- Advisory Board Materials: Cohort analyses and treatment recommendation frameworks
- Publication Planning: Manuscript-ready analyses for peer-reviewed journals
- Clinical Guidelines
- Guideline Development: Evidence synthesis with GRADE methodology for specialty societies
- Consensus Recommendations: Multi-stakeholder treatment algorithm development
- Practice Standards: Biomarker-based treatment selection criteria
- Quality Measures: Evidence-based performance metrics
- Real-World Evidence
- RWE Cohort Studies: Retrospective analyses of patient cohorts from EMR data
- Comparative Effectiveness: Head-to-head treatment comparisons in real-world settings
- Outcomes Research: Long-term survival and safety in clinical practice
- Health Economics: Cost-effectiveness analyses by biomarker subgroup
When to Use
Use this skill when you need to:
- Analyze patient cohorts stratified by biomarkers, molecular subtypes, or clinical characteristics
- Generate treatment recommendation reports with evidence grading for clinical guidelines or pharmaceutical strategies
- Compare outcomes between patient subgroups with statistical analysis (survival, response rates, hazard ratios)
- Produce pharmaceutical research documents for drug development, clinical trials, or regulatory submissions
- Develop clinical practice guidelines with GRADE evidence grading and decision algorithms
- Document biomarker-guided therapy selection at the population level (not individual patients)
- Synthesize evidence from multiple trials or real-world data sources
- Create clinical decision algorithms with flowcharts for treatment sequencing
- Do NOT use this skill for:
- Individual patient treatment plans (use `treatment-plans` skill)
- Bedside clinical care documentation (use `treatment-plans` skill)
- Simple patient-specific treatment protocols (use `treatment-plans` skill)
Visual Enhancement with Scientific Schematics
⚠️ MANDATORY: Every clinical decision support document MUST include at least 1-2 AI-generated figures using the scientific-schematics skill.
- This is not optional. Clinical decision documents require clear visual algorithms. Before finalizing any document:
- Generate at minimum ONE schematic or diagram (e.g., clinical decision algorithm, treatment pathway, or biomarker stratification tree)
- For cohort analyses: include patient flow diagram
- For treatment recommendations: include decision flowchart
- How to generate figures:
- Use the scientific-schematics skill to generate AI-powered publication-quality diagrams
- Simply describe your desired diagram in natural language
- Nano Banana Pro will automatically generate, review, and refine the schematic
How to generate schematics: ```bash python scripts/generate_schematic.py "your diagram description" -o figures/output.png ```
- The AI will automatically:
- Create publication-quality images with proper formatting
- Review and refine through multiple iterations
- Ensure accessibility (colorblind-friendly, high contrast)
- Save outputs in the figures/ directory
- When to add schematics:
- Clinical decision algorithm flowcharts
- Treatment pathway diagrams
- Biomarker stratification trees
- Patient cohort flow diagrams (CONSORT-style)
- Survival curve visualizations
- Molecular mechanism diagrams
- Any complex concept that benefits from visualization
For detailed guidance on creating schematics, refer to the scientific-schematics skill documentation.
---
Document Structure
CRITICAL REQUIREMENT: All clinical decision support documents MUST begin with a complete executive summary on page 1 that spans the entire first page before any table of contents or detailed sections.
Page 1 Executive Summary Structure
The first page of every CDS document should contain ONLY the executive summary with the following components:
- Required Elements (all on page 1):
- Document Title and Type
- - Main title (e.g., "Biomarker-Stratified Cohort Analysis" or "Evidence-Based Treatment Recommendations")
- - Subtitle with disease state and focus
- Report Information Box (using colored tcolorbox)
- - Document type and purpose
- - Date of analysis/report
- - Disease state and patient population
- - Author/institution (if applicable)
- - Analysis framework or methodology
- Key Findings Boxes (3-5 colored boxes using tcolorbox)
- - Primary Results (blue box): Main efficacy/outcome findings
- - Biomarker Insights (green box): Key molecular subtype findings
- - Clinical Implications (yellow/orange box): Actionable treatment implications
- - Statistical Summary (gray box): Hazard ratios, p-values, key statistics
- - Safety Highlights (red box, if applicable): Critical adverse events or warnings
- Visual Requirements:
- Use `\thispagestyle{empty}` to remove page numbers from page 1
- All content must fit on page 1 (before `\newpage`)
- Use colored tcolorbox environments with different colors for visual hierarchy
- Boxes should be scannable and highlight most critical information
- Use bullet points, not narrative paragraphs
- End page 1 with `\newpage` before table of contents or detailed sections
Example First Page LaTeX Structure: ```latex \maketitle \thispagestyle{empty}
% Report Information Box \begin{tcolorbox}[colback=blue!5!white, colframe=blue!75!black, title=Report Information] \textbf{Document Type:} Patient Cohort Analysis\\ \textbf{Disease State:} HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer\\ \textbf{Analysis Date:} \today\\ \textbf{Population:} 60 patients, biomarker-stratified by HR status \end{tcolorbox}
\vspace{0.3cm}
% Key Finding #1: Primary Results \begin{tcolorbox}[colback=blue!5!white, colframe=blue!75!black, title=Primary Efficacy Results] \begin{itemize} \item Overall ORR: 72\% (95\% CI: 59-83\%) \item Median PFS: 18.5 months (95\% CI: 14.2-22.8) \item Median OS: 35.2 months (95\% CI: 28.1-NR) \end{itemize} \end{tcolorbox}
\vspace{0.3cm}
% Key Finding #2: Biomarker Insights \begin{tcolorbox}[colback=green!5!white, colframe=green!75!black, title=Biomarker Stratification Findings] \begin{itemize} \item HR+/HER2+: ORR 68\%, median PFS 16.2 months \item HR-/HER2+: ORR 78\%, median PFS 22.1 months \item HR status significantly associated with outcomes (p=0.041) \end{itemize} \end{tcolorbox}
\vspace{0.3cm}
% Key Finding #3: Clinical Implications \begin{tcolorbox}[colback=orange!5!white, colframe=orange!75!black, title=Clinical Recommendations] \begin{itemize} \item Strong efficacy observed regardless of HR status (Grade 1A) \item HR-/HER2+ patients showed numerically superior outcomes \item Treatment recommended for all HER2+ MBC patients \end{itemize} \end{tcolorbox}
\newpage \tableofcontents % TOC on page 2 \newpage % Detailed content starts page 3 ```
Patient Cohort Analysis (Detailed Sections - Page 3+) - **Cohort Characteristics**: Demographics, baseline features, patient selection criteria - **Biomarker Stratification**: Molecular subtypes, genomic alterations, IHC profiles - **Treatment Exposure**: Therapies received, dosing, treatment duration by subgroup - **Outcome Analysis**: Response rates (ORR, DCR), survival data (OS, PFS), DOR - **Statistical Methods**: Kaplan-Meier survival curves, hazard ratios, log-rank tests, Cox regression - **Subgroup Comparisons**: Biomarker-stratified efficacy, forest plots, statistical significance - **Safety Profile**: Adverse events by subgroup, dose modifications, discontinuations - **Clinical Recommendations**: Treatment implications based on biomarker profiles - **Figures**: Waterfall plots, swimmer plots, survival curves, forest plots - **Tables**: Demographics table, biomarker frequency, outcomes by subgroup
Treatment Recommendation Reports (Detailed Sections - Page 3+)
- Page 1 Executive Summary for Treatment Recommendations should include:
- Report Information Box: Disease state, guideline version/date, target population
- Key Recommendations Box (green): Top 3-5 GRADE-graded recommendations by line of therapy
- Biomarker Decision Criteria Box (blue): Key molecular markers influencing treatment selection
- Evidence Summary Box (gray): Major trials supporting recommendations (e.g., KEYNOTE-189, FLAURA)
- Critical Monitoring Box (orange/red): Essential safety monitoring requirements
- Detailed Sections (Page 3+):
- Clinical Context: Disease state, epidemiology, current treatment landscape
- Target Population: Patient characteristics, biomarker criteria, staging
- Evidence Review: Systematic literature synthesis, guideline summary, trial data
- Treatment Options: Available therapies with mechanism of action
- Evidence Grading: GRADE assessment for each recommendation (1A, 1B, 2A, 2B, 2C)
- Recommendations by Line: First-line, second-line, subsequent therapies
- Biomarker-Guided Selection: Decision criteria based on molecular profiles
- Treatment Algorithms: TikZ flowcharts showing decision pathways
- Monitoring Protocol: Safety assessments, efficacy monitoring, dose modifications
- Special Populations: Elderly, renal/hepatic impairment, comorbidities
- References: Full bibliography with trial names and citations
Output Format
- MANDATORY FIRST PAGE REQUIREMENT:
- Page 1: Full-page executive summary with 3-5 colored tcolorbox elements
- Page 2: Table of contents (optional)
- Page 3+: Detailed sections with methods, results, figures, tables
- Document Specifications:
- Primary: LaTeX/PDF with 0.5in margins for compact, data-dense presentation
- Length: Typically 5-15 pages (1 page executive summary + 4-14 pages detailed content)
- Style: Publication-ready, pharmaceutical-grade, suitable for regulatory submissions
- First Page: Always a complete executive summary spanning entire page 1 (see Document Structure section)
- Visual Elements:
- Colors:
- - Page 1 boxes: blue=data/information, green=biomarkers/recommendations, yellow/orange=clinical implications, red=warnings
- - Recommendation boxes (green=strong recommendation, yellow=conditional, blue=research needed)
- - Biomarker stratification (color-coded molecular subtypes)
- - Statistical significance (color-coded p-values, hazard ratios)
- Tables:
- - Demographics with baseline characteristics
- - Biomarker frequency by subgroup
- - Outcomes table (ORR, PFS, OS, DOR by molecular subtype)
- - Adverse events by cohort
- - Evidence summary tables with GRADE ratings
- Figures:
- - Kaplan-Meier survival curves with log-rank p-values and number at risk tables
- - Waterfall plots showing best response by patient
- - Forest plots for subgroup analyses with confidence intervals
- - TikZ decision algorithm flowcharts
- - Swimmer plots for individual patient timelines
- Statistics: Hazard ratios with 95% CI, p-values, median survival times, landmark survival rates
- Compliance: De-identification per HIPAA Safe Harbor, confidentiality notices for proprietary data
Integration
- This skill integrates with:
- scientific-writing: Citation management, statistical reporting, evidence synthesis
- clinical-reports: Medical terminology, HIPAA compliance, regulatory documentation
- scientific-schematics: TikZ flowcharts for decision algorithms and treatment pathways
- treatment-plans: Individual patient applications of cohort-derived insights (bidirectional)
Key Differentiators from Treatment-Plans Skill
- Clinical Decision Support (this skill):
- Audience: Pharmaceutical companies, clinical researchers, guideline committees, medical affairs
- Scope: Population-level analyses, evidence synthesis, guideline development
- Focus: Biomarker stratification, statistical comparisons, evidence grading
- Output: Multi-page analytical documents (5-15 pages typical) with extensive figures and tables
- Use Cases: Drug development, regulatory submissions, clinical practice guidelines, medical strategy
- Example: "Analyze 60 HER2+ breast cancer patients by hormone receptor status with survival outcomes"
- Treatment-Plans Skill:
- Audience: Clinicians, patients, care teams
- Scope: Individual patient care planning
- Focus: SMART goals, patient-specific interventions, monitoring plans
- Output: Concise 1-4 page actionable care plans
- Use Cases: Bedside clinical care, EMR documentation, patient-centered planning
- Example: "Create treatment plan for a 55-year-old patient with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes"
- When to use each:
- Use clinical-decision-support for: cohort analyses, biomarker stratification studies, treatment guideline development, pharmaceutical strategy documents
- Use treatment-plans for: individual patient care plans, treatment protocols for specific patients, bedside clinical documentation
Example Usage
Patient Cohort Analysis
Example 1: NSCLC Biomarker Stratification ``` > Analyze a cohort of 45 NSCLC patients stratified by PD-L1 expression (<1%, 1-49%, ≥50%) > receiving pembrolizumab. Include outcomes: ORR, median PFS, median OS with hazard ratios > comparing PD-L1 ≥50% vs <50%. Generate Kaplan-Meier curves and waterfall plot. ```
Example 2: GBM Molecular Subtype Analysis ``` > Generate cohort analysis for 30 GBM patients classified into Cluster 1 (Mesenchymal-Immune-Active) > and Cluster 2 (Proneural) molecular subtypes. Compare outcomes including median OS, 6-month PFS rate, > and response to TMZ+bevacizumab. Include biomarker profile table and statistical comparison. ```
Example 3: Breast Cancer HER2 Cohort ``` > Analyze 60 HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients treated with trastuzumab-deruxtecan, > stratified by prior trastuzumab exposure (yes/no). Include ORR, DOR, median PFS with forest plot > showing subgroup analyses by hormone receptor status, brain metastases, and number of prior lines. ```
Treatment Recommendation Report
Example 1: HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer Guidelines ``` > Create evidence-based treatment recommendations for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer including > biomarker-guided therapy selection. Use GRADE system to grade recommendations for first-line > (trastuzumab+pertuzumab+taxane), second-line (trastuzumab-deruxtecan), and third-line options. > Include decision algorithm flowchart based on brain metastases, hormone receptor status, and prior therapies. ```
Example 2: Advanced NSCLC Treatment Algorithm ``` > Generate treatment recommendation report for advanced NSCLC based on PD-L1 expression, EGFR mutation, > ALK rearrangement, and performance status. Include GRADE-graded recommendations for each molecular subtype, > TikZ flowchart for biomarker-directed therapy selection, and evidence tables from KEYNOTE-189, FLAURA, > and CheckMate-227 trials. ```
Example 3: Multiple Myeloma Line-of-Therapy Sequencing ``` > Create treatment algorithm for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma through relapsed/refractory setting. > Include GRADE recommendations for transplant-eligible vs ineligible, high-risk cytogenetics considerations, > and sequencing of daratumumab, carfilzomib, and CAR-T therapy. Provide flowchart showing decision points > at each line of therapy. ```
Key Features
Biomarker Classification - Genomic: Mutations, CNV, gene fusions - Expression: RNA-seq, IHC scores - Molecular subtypes: Disease-specific classifications - Clinical actionability: Therapy selection guidance
Outcome Metrics - Survival: OS (overall survival), PFS (progression-free survival) - Response: ORR (objective response rate), DOR (duration of response), DCR (disease control rate) - Quality: ECOG performance status, symptom burden - Safety: Adverse events, dose modifications
Statistical Methods - Survival analysis: Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank tests - Group comparisons: t-tests, chi-square, Fisher's exact - Effect sizes: Hazard ratios, odds ratios with 95% CI - Significance: p-values, multiple testing corrections
Evidence Grading
- GRADE System
- 1A: Strong recommendation, high-quality evidence
- 1B: Strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence
- 2A: Weak recommendation, high-quality evidence
- 2B: Weak recommendation, moderate-quality evidence
- 2C: Weak recommendation, low-quality evidence
- Recommendation Strength
- Strong: Benefits clearly outweigh risks
- Conditional: Trade-offs exist, patient values important
- Research: Insufficient evidence, clinical trials needed
Best Practices
For Cohort Analyses
- Patient Selection Transparency: Clearly document inclusion/exclusion criteria, patient flow, and reasons for exclusions
- Biomarker Clarity: Specify assay methods, platforms (e.g., FoundationOne, Caris), cut-points, and validation status
- Statistical Rigor:
- - Report hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals, not just p-values
- - Include median follow-up time for survival analyses
- - Specify statistical tests used (log-rank, Cox regression, Fisher's exact)
- - Account for multiple comparisons when appropriate
- Outcome Definitions: Use standard criteria:
- - Response: RECIST 1.1, iRECIST for immunotherapy
- - Adverse events: CTCAE version 5.0
- - Performance status: ECOG or Karnofsky
- Survival Data Presentation:
- - Median OS/PFS with 95% CI
- - Landmark survival rates (6-month, 12-month, 24-month)
- - Number at risk tables below Kaplan-Meier curves
- - Censoring clearly indicated
- Subgroup Analyses: Pre-specify subgroups; clearly label exploratory vs pre-planned analyses
- Data Completeness: Report missing data and how it was handled
For Treatment Recommendation Reports
- Evidence Grading Transparency:
- - Use GRADE system consistently (1A, 1B, 2A, 2B, 2C)
- - Document rationale for each grade
- - Clearly state quality of evidence (high, moderate, low, very low)
- Comprehensive Evidence Review:
- - Include phase 3 randomized trials as primary evidence
- - Supplement with phase 2 data for emerging therapies
- - Note real-world evidence and meta-analyses
- - Cite trial names (e.g., KEYNOTE-189, CheckMate-227)
- Biomarker-Guided Recommendations:
- - Link specific biomarkers to therapy recommendations
- - Specify testing methods and validated assays
- - Include FDA/EMA approval status for companion diagnostics
- Clinical Actionability: Every recommendation should have clear implementation guidance
- Decision Algorithm Clarity: TikZ flowcharts should be unambiguous with clear yes/no decision points
- Special Populations: Address elderly, renal/hepatic impairment, pregnancy, drug interactions
- Monitoring Guidance: Specify safety labs, imaging, and frequency
- Update Frequency: Date recommendations and plan for periodic updates
General Best Practices
- First Page Executive Summary (MANDATORY):
- - ALWAYS create a complete executive summary on page 1 that spans the entire first page
- - Use 3-5 colored tcolorbox elements to highlight key findings
- - No table of contents or detailed sections on page 1
- - Use `\thispagestyle{empty}` and end with `\newpage`
- - This is the single most important page - it should be scannable in 60 seconds
- De-identification: Remove all 18 HIPAA identifiers before document generation (Safe Harbor method)
- Regulatory Compliance: Include confidentiality notices for proprietary pharmaceutical data
- Publication-Ready Formatting: Use 0.5in margins, professional fonts, color-coded sections
- Reproducibility: Document all statistical methods to enable replication
- Conflict of Interest: Disclose pharmaceutical funding or relationships when applicable
- Visual Hierarchy: Use colored boxes consistently (blue=data, green=biomarkers, yellow/orange=recommendations, red=warnings)
References
- See the `references/` directory for detailed guidance on:
- Patient cohort analysis and stratification methods
- Treatment recommendation development
- Clinical decision algorithms
- Biomarker classification and interpretation
- Outcome analysis and statistical methods
- Evidence synthesis and grading systems
Templates
- See the `assets/` directory for LaTeX templates:
- `cohort_analysis_template.tex` - Biomarker-stratified patient cohort analysis with statistical comparisons
- `treatment_recommendation_template.tex` - Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines with GRADE grading
- `clinical_pathway_template.tex` - TikZ decision algorithm flowcharts for treatment sequencing
- `biomarker_report_template.tex` - Molecular subtype classification and genomic profile reports
- `evidence_synthesis_template.tex` - Systematic evidence review and meta-analysis summaries
- Template Features:
- 0.5in margins for compact presentation
- Color-coded recommendation boxes
- Professional tables for demographics, biomarkers, outcomes
- Built-in support for Kaplan-Meier curves, waterfall plots, forest plots
- GRADE evidence grading tables
- Confidentiality headers for pharmaceutical documents
Scripts
- See the `scripts/` directory for analysis and visualization tools:
- `generate_survival_analysis.py` - Kaplan-Meier curve generation with log-rank tests, hazard ratios, 95% CI
- `create_waterfall_plot.py` - Best response visualization for cohort analyses
- `create_forest_plot.py` - Subgroup analysis visualization with confidence intervals
- `create_cohort_tables.py` - Demographics, biomarker frequency, and outcomes tables
- `build_decision_tree.py` - TikZ flowchart generation for treatment algorithms
- `biomarker_classifier.py` - Patient stratification algorithms by molecular subtype
- `calculate_statistics.py` - Hazard ratios, Cox regression, log-rank tests, Fisher's exact
- `validate_cds_document.py` - Quality and compliance checks (HIPAA, statistical reporting standards)
- `grade_evidence.py` - Automated GRADE assessment helper for treatment recommendations
Use Cases
- Support clinical decision-making with evidence-based medical guidelines
- Analyze patient data patterns for diagnostic support and risk assessment
- Generate treatment recommendations based on clinical evidence databases
- Build clinical decision support workflows for healthcare applications
- Evaluate treatment options using structured clinical criteria and outcomes data
Pros & Cons
Pros
- +Compatible with multiple platforms including claude-code, codex, gemini, cursor
- +Well-documented with detailed usage instructions and examples
- +Purpose-built for documentation & writing tasks with focused functionality
Cons
- -No built-in analytics or usage metrics dashboard
- -Configuration may require familiarity with documentation & writing concepts
FAQ
What does Clinical Decision Support do?
What platforms support Clinical Decision Support?
What are the use cases for Clinical Decision Support?
100+ free AI tools
Writing, PDF, image, and developer tools — all in your browser.
Next Step
Use the skill detail page to evaluate fit and install steps. For a direct browser workflow, move into a focused tool route instead of staying in broader support surfaces.