Skip to content

React Composition

Verified

React composition patterns for scalable component architecture. Use when refactoring components with boolean prop proliferation, building flexible component libraries, designing reusable component APIs, or working with compound components and context providers.

325

Install

Claude Code

Add to .claude/skills/

About This Skill

# React Composition Patterns

Composition patterns for building flexible, maintainable React components. Avoid boolean prop proliferation by using compound components, lifting state, and composing internals. These patterns make codebases easier to work with as they scale.

When to Apply

  • Refactoring components with many boolean props
  • Building reusable component libraries
  • Designing flexible component APIs
  • Working with compound components or context providers

Pattern Overview

| # | Pattern | Impact | |---|----------------------------|----------| | 1 | Avoid Boolean Props | CRITICAL | | 2 | Compound Components | HIGH | | 3 | Context Interface (DI) | HIGH | | 4 | State Lifting | HIGH | | 5 | Explicit Variants | MEDIUM | | 6 | Children Over Render Props | MEDIUM |

Installation

OpenClaw / Moltbot / Clawbot

```bash npx clawhub@latest install react-composition ```

---

1. Avoid Boolean Prop Proliferation

Don't add boolean props like `isThread`, `isEditing`, `isDMThread` to customize behavior. Each boolean doubles possible states and creates unmaintainable conditional logic. Use composition instead.

```tsx // BAD — boolean props create exponential complexity function Composer({ isThread, isDMThread, isEditing, isForwarding }: Props) { return ( <form> <Input /> {isDMThread ? <AlsoSendToDMField /> : isThread ? <AlsoSendToChannelField /> : null} {isEditing ? <EditActions /> : isForwarding ? <ForwardActions /> : <DefaultActions />} </form> ) }

// GOOD — composition eliminates conditionals function ChannelComposer() { return ( <Composer.Frame> <Composer.Input /> <Composer.Footer><Composer.Attachments /><Composer.Submit /></Composer.Footer> </Composer.Frame> ) }

function ThreadComposer({ channelId }: { channelId: string }) { return ( <Composer.Frame> <Composer.Input /> <AlsoSendToChannelField id={channelId} /> <Composer.Footer><Composer.Submit /></Composer.Footer> </Composer.Frame> ) } ```

Each variant is explicit about what it renders. Shared internals without a monolithic parent.

2. Compound Components

Structure complex components with shared context. Each subcomponent accesses state via context, not props. Export as a namespace object.

```tsx const ComposerContext = createContext<ComposerContextValue | null>(null)

function ComposerProvider({ children, state, actions, meta }: ProviderProps) { return <ComposerContext value={{ state, actions, meta }}>{children}</ComposerContext> } function ComposerInput() { const { state, actions: { update }, meta: { inputRef } } = use(ComposerContext) return <TextInput ref={inputRef} value={state.input} onChangeText={(t) => update((s) => ({ ...s, input: t }))} /> }

const Composer = { Provider: ComposerProvider, Frame: ComposerFrame, Input: ComposerInput, Submit: ComposerSubmit, Footer: ComposerFooter, }

// Consumers compose exactly what they need <Composer.Provider state={state} actions={actions} meta={meta}> <Composer.Frame> <Composer.Input /> <Composer.Footer><Composer.Formatting /><Composer.Submit /></Composer.Footer> </Composer.Frame> </Composer.Provider> ```

3. Generic Context Interface (Dependency Injection)

Define a generic interface with `state`, `actions`, and `meta`. Any provider implements this contract — enabling the same UI to work with different state implementations. The provider is the only place that knows how state is managed.

```tsx interface ComposerContextValue { state: { input: string; attachments: Attachment[]; isSubmitting: boolean } actions: { update: (fn: (s: ComposerState) => ComposerState) => void; submit: () => void } meta: { inputRef: React.RefObject<TextInput> } }

// Provider A: Local state for ephemeral forms function ForwardMessageProvider({ children }: { children: React.ReactNode }) { const [state, setState] = useState(initialState) return ( <ComposerContext value={{ state, actions: { update: setState, submit: useForwardMessage() }, meta: { inputRef: useRef(null) } }}>{children}</ComposerContext> ) }

// Provider B: Global synced state for channels function ChannelProvider({ channelId, children }: Props) { const { state, update, submit } = useGlobalChannel(channelId) return ( <ComposerContext value={{ state, actions: { update, submit }, meta: { inputRef: useRef(null) } }}>{children}</ComposerContext> ) } ```

Swap the provider, keep the UI. Same `Composer.Input` works with both.

4. Lift State into Providers

Move state into dedicated provider components so sibling components outside the main UI can access and modify state without prop drilling or refs.

```tsx // BAD — state trapped inside component; siblings can't access it function ForwardMessageComposer() { const [state, setState] = useState(initialState) return <Composer.Frame><Composer.Input /><Composer.Footer /></Composer.Frame> } function ForwardMessageDialog() { return ( <Dialog> <ForwardMessageComposer /> <MessagePreview /> {/* Can't access composer state */} <ForwardButton /> {/* Can't call submit */} </Dialog> ) }

// GOOD — state lifted to provider; any descendant can access it function ForwardMessageProvider({ children }: { children: React.ReactNode }) { const [state, setState] = useState(initialState) const submit = useForwardMessage() return ( <Composer.Provider state={state} actions={{ update: setState, submit }} meta={{ inputRef: useRef(null) }}>{children}</Composer.Provider> ) } function ForwardMessageDialog() { return ( <ForwardMessageProvider> <Dialog> <ForwardMessageComposer /> <MessagePreview /> {/* Reads state from context */} <ForwardButton /> {/* Calls submit from context */} </Dialog> </ForwardMessageProvider> ) } function ForwardButton() { const { actions } = use(Composer.Context) return <Button onPress={actions.submit}>Forward</Button> } ```

Key insight: Components that need shared state don't have to be visually nested — they just need to be within the same provider.

5. Explicit Variant Components

Instead of one component with many boolean props, create explicit variants. Each composes the pieces it needs — self-documenting, no impossible states.

```tsx // BAD — what does this render? <Composer isThread isEditing={false} channelId="abc" showAttachments showFormatting={false} />

// GOOD — immediately clear <ThreadComposer channelId="abc" /> <EditMessageComposer messageId="xyz" /> <ForwardMessageComposer messageId="123" /> ```

Each variant is explicit about its provider/state, UI elements, and actions.

6. Children Over Render Props

Use `children` for composition instead of `renderX` props. Children are more readable and compose naturally.

```tsx // BAD — render props <Composer renderHeader={() => <CustomHeader />} renderFooter={() => <><Formatting /><Emojis /></>} />

// GOOD — children composition <Composer.Frame> <CustomHeader /> <Composer.Input /> <Composer.Footer><Composer.Formatting /><SubmitButton /></Composer.Footer> </Composer.Frame> ```

When render props are appropriate: When the parent needs to pass data back (e.g., `renderItem={({ item, index }) => ...}`).

Decision Guide

  1. Component has 3+ boolean props? → Extract explicit variants (1, 5)
  2. Component has render props? → Convert to compound components (2, 6)
  3. Siblings need shared state? → Lift state to provider (4)
  4. Same UI, different data sources? → Generic context interface (3)
  5. Building a component library? → Apply all patterns together

Use Cases

  • Apply React composition patterns for maintainable component architecture
  • Build modern UI components using shadcn/ui with Tailwind CSS
  • Create local business websites with React and modern web technologies
  • Follow React best practices for component design, state management, and performance
  • Build production-ready frontend applications with proper patterns and testing

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • + Solid adoption with 650+ downloads
  • + Follows modern frontend best practices and established patterns
  • + Production-ready code examples reduce implementation time

Cons

  • - Framework-specific — may not apply to projects using different technology stacks
  • - Opinionated patterns may conflict with existing project conventions

Frequently Asked Questions

What does React Composition do?

React composition patterns for scalable component architecture. Use when refactoring components with boolean prop proliferation, building flexible component libraries, designing reusable component APIs, or working with compound components and context providers.

What platforms support React Composition?

React Composition is available on Claude Code, OpenClaw.

What are the use cases for React Composition?

Apply React composition patterns for maintainable component architecture. Build modern UI components using shadcn/ui with Tailwind CSS. Create local business websites with React and modern web technologies.

Stay Updated on Agent Skills

Get weekly curated skills + safety alerts