Skip to content
Intermediate

Best Claude Prompt for Portfolio Review

Why Claude?

Claude is best for portfolio analysis because it rigorously assesses correlation, concentration risk, and rebalancing logic without an upsell agenda. Its structured output via XML input makes it ideal for presenting holdings data cleanly and getting a consistent analytical framework in return.

Prompt Template
Open Claude
<role>
You are an independent portfolio analyst. You have no product to sell. Your job is to give honest, rigorous feedback on portfolio construction — including uncomfortable findings about concentration, correlation, and risk-adjusted return. Be honest about uncertainty when historical data is limited.
</role>

<portfolio>
{{portfolio_holdings}}
</portfolio>

<investor_profile>
Investment horizon: {{time_horizon}}
Risk tolerance: {{risk_tolerance}}
Portfolio purpose: {{portfolio_purpose}}
Current concerns: {{investor_concerns}}
</investor_profile>

<instructions>
Analyze this portfolio across five dimensions:

1. **Concentration risk**: What are the top 3 concentration risks (single stock, sector, geography, factor)? Quantify where possible — e.g. "X% of the portfolio is effectively a bet on Y."

2. **Correlation analysis**: Identify which holdings are likely to move together in a risk-off environment. Which positions that look diversified are actually correlated? What is the realistic effective number of independent bets in this portfolio?

3. **Risk-adjusted return assessment**: Based on the current allocation, what return profile is this portfolio likely targeting? Is there a mismatch between the stated risk tolerance and the actual risk embedded in the holdings?

4. **Rebalancing recommendations**: Which 2-3 specific changes would most improve the portfolio's risk profile given the investor's stated goals? For each change, explain: what risk it reduces, what upside it might sacrifice, and why the tradeoff is worth it.

5. **Stress test scenarios**: How would this portfolio likely perform in: (a) a 25% broad market decline, (b) a rapid rate rise of 200bps, (c) a dollar strengthening 15%? Give directional estimates, not false precision.

Conclude with one paragraph on the portfolio's single biggest structural vulnerability.

This is not financial advice. Always consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.
</instructions>
Example Output
**Concentration risk:** This portfolio has a significant hidden concentration problem. NVDA + AAPL + MSFT + AMZN + QQQ + SPY together represent ~73% of assets, but QQQ and SPY are themselves heavily weighted toward the same mega-cap tech names. Effective tech exposure is likely 55-65% of the total portfolio — not the ~48% the labels suggest. Your instinct about tech overexposure is correct. **Correlation analysis:** In a risk-off scenario (e.g., 2022 tech selloff), NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AMZN, QQQ, and SPY will all decline simultaneously and significantly. BTC has shown increasing correlation with high-beta tech in risk-off periods. Effective independent bets: approximately 3-4 (tech growth, macro hedge via gold/treasuries, crypto). You have 10 tickers but not 10 independent risks.
Show full example
**Rebalancing recommendations:** 1. Reduce NVDA from 18% to 8-10% — single-stock risk at that weight in a volatile name is inconsistent with moderate risk tolerance. 2. Add international developed market exposure (e.g., VXUS or EFA, 10-15%) — zero current geographic diversification outside US. 3. Consider TIPS instead of nominal Treasuries given inflation concerns — your stated worry about inflation is unaddressed by the current fixed income allocation. **Single biggest vulnerability:** This portfolio will behave like a single-factor bet on US large-cap tech in any market stress scenario. The diversification is largely cosmetic. This is not financial advice.

Make it yours

Got your AI output? Make it better.

Paste what Claude generated into Coda One — free, no signup.

Tips for Better Results
Paste your actual holdings with current allocation percentages for the most useful analysis. Claude can handle up to 30-40 positions cleanly. Include your investment horizon and risk tolerance explicitly — without them, the rebalancing recommendations will be generic.
Example (filled in)
<portfolio> NVDA 18%, AAPL 12%, MSFT 10%, AMZN 8%, QQQ 10%, SPY 15%, BTC 7%, Gold ETF 5%, US 10Y Treasury 10%, Cash 5% </portfolio> <investor_profile> Investment horizon: 10 years Risk tolerance: moderate — can tolerate 20% drawdown Portfolio purpose: retirement growth Current concerns: worried about tech overexposure and inflation </investor_profile>